Empower Email Performance Dashboard

Last Updated: Feb 17, 2026
to
0
Total Emails Sent
0 emails
-- vs prior period
0%
Open Rate
0 total opens
-- vs prior period
0%
Click Rate
0 total clicks
-- vs prior period
0
Total Unsubscribes
0% avg rate
-- vs prior period
Showing: All time
Open Rate & Click Rate Trends (Weekly)
Open Rate
Click Rate
Emails Sent by Brand
Recent Email Performance
Showing 0 emails
Brand Email Name Send Date Sent Opens Open Rate Clicks Click Rate Unsubs
Brand Performance Comparison
Sort by:
Brand Ranking Table
Rank Brand Emails Total Sent Avg Open Rate Avg Click Rate Total Unsubs Account
HubSpot Account Performance
All Email Performance Data
Sort by:
Showing 0 emails
Brand Email Name Subject Line Date Sent Delivered Opens Open % Clicks Click % CTOR % Unsubs Bounces
Where lift comes from next Email-side optimization (subject lines, send time, layout, CTA, cadence) is mature across all brands. Within the current audience, the data shows diminishing returns from further creative iteration. Continued growth in opens, clicks, and revenue is now gated on net-new contacts entering the top of each brand’s funnel — site sign-ups, post-treatment opt-ins, in-store capture, paid social, and recovery of dormant contacts.
Top-of-Funnel · Reachable Audience & Churn
Per-Brand Audience & Churn Detail
Brand Reachable audience Avg recipients · last 4 wks Avg recipients · prior weeks Δ vs. prior Unsubs / 30d Implied annual churn Signal
Performance Insights
Top Performing Emails (Open Rate)
    Top Performing Emails (Click Rate)
      📊
      Best Performing Brands (Avg Open Rate)
        📈
        Highest Volume Brands
          Weekly Trends
          Weekly Email Volume & Performance
          💡
          Key Observations
            🧪
            Optimization Maturity
              🎯
              Where Lift Comes From Next
                📋
                Top-of-Funnel Action Items (Partner Data Needed)
                  Revision Tracking
                  --
                  Total Edit Requests
                  body + comments
                  --
                  Avg Edits / Brand / Week
                  across all brands
                  --
                  Most Edits (Brand)
                  --
                  --
                  Scope Impact Edits
                  new emails + scope changes + late additions
                  Edit Requests by Brand
                  Edit Type Distribution
                  Weekly Edit Volume Trend
                  Edits vs. Performance
                  Brands with fewer revision rounds tend to maintain higher open rates — supporting simpler, more focused emails sent more frequently.
                  Edit Detail
                  Showing 0 edits
                  Week Brand Status # Edits Edit Types Source Preview
                  Email Performance · Prepared by Captive Demand
                  Q1 2026 Performance Report
                  January 1 – March 31, 2026  ·  comparisons are internal year-over-year (Q1 2025 → Q1 2026)
                  CAPTIVE DEMAND
                  Volume vs. Rate at a Glance

                  Email programs are measured on two axes: how much business they generate (absolute volume) and how efficiently each send performs (rate). Q1 2026 grew both reach and total business impact while creative quality (CTOR) held under that scale.

                  Performance Snapshot — Platform & Per Brand

                  Each cell shows the Q1 2026 value on top. Open Rate and Click Rate cells stack two YoY pills: the rate YoY (efficiency-per-recipient) and the absolute opens/clicks YoY (the volume that drives business). Most brands grew absolute opens and clicks YoY even where the rate softened — the truer measure of program output. Bounce and Unsub are colored by absolute health (industry-excellent < 0.5%; acceptable < 1%) since YoY % from a tiny base is statistical noise. Sorted by Q1 send volume.

                  Brand Campaigns Q1 Sends
                  value · YoY
                  Open Rate
                  rate YoY · opens YoY
                  Click Rate
                  rate YoY · clicks YoY
                  CTOR
                  value · YoY
                  Bounce Rate
                  absolute health
                  Unsub Rate
                  absolute health

                  % change shows YoY (Q1 2025 → Q1 2026). Open Rate and Click Rate cells show two pills: the top is the YoY change in the rate; the bottom is the YoY change in absolute opens / clicks (the volume that drives business). Rate dilution is mathematically expected when reach grows; absolute volume is the truer measure of program output. Bounce and Unsub are colored by absolute health (industry-excellent < 0.5%; acceptable < 1%) since YoY % from a tiny base is not a meaningful signal. CTOR isolates creative quality and is the cleanest single read on the email itself. Brands marked New on platform have no Q1 2025 baseline.

                  What Each Metric Measures
                  • Open Rate (OR) — % of delivered emails opened. Reflects subject line, sender reputation, and audience health/recency.
                  • Click Rate (CTR) — % of delivered emails clicked. Reflects offer strength, creative, and audience interest alignment.
                  • Click-to-Open (CTOR) — % of opens that produced a click. Isolates creative and message quality independent of list health — the cleanest signal that the email itself is working.
                  • Bounce Rate — % of sends to invalid addresses. Reflects list hygiene and sender reputation.
                  • Unsubscribe Rate — % opting out per send. Reflects frequency & relevance for the engaged audience.
                  Diagnosis — Where the Program Is Winning, Where the Activation Opportunity Is
                  Q2 Roadmap — Clean Accountability Split

                  Two parallel workstreams. Captive Demand owns sustained creative quality, cadence, and deliverability. Per-brand activation work compounds the Captive Demand engine when paired alongside it.

                  Captive Demand — Continued Commitments
                    Recommended Per-Brand Actions
                      Q2 ask: a 30-minute working session per brand to walk through the brand-specific list-health scorecard and prioritized action list. Captive Demand will produce the scorecards and lead the call.
                      How to Read This Report
                      • Apples-to-apples scope. Built on each brand's core marketing campaigns — the bulk monthly sends ("Core 4" series, monthly specials, ICYMI, last-chance) that go to the brand's full active list. Notification, post-treatment, member-only, follow-up, B2B, and event-segment sends (under 1,000 recipients) are excluded so the platform average reflects the program's primary marketing surface, not micro-list noise.
                      • Comparison window. Each rate cell shows YoY (Q1 2025 → Q1 2026) movement. YoY is the cleanest apples-to-apples baseline for a quarterly cadence; Q4 2025 included Botox Day, Black Friday, and platform-onboarding tentpoles that don't repeat in Q1.
                      • All comparisons are internal. We do not anchor against external industry benchmarks because Apple Mail Privacy Protection has inflated reported Open Rates ~50% across all email service providers since iOS 15 (Sept 2021), and every email platform measures "delivered" and "engaged" differently. Internal trajectory and within-portfolio variance are the most reliable lens for a program of this scale.
                      • Why CTOR is the cleanest message-quality signal. CTOR (clicks among openers) isolates how compelling the email content is, separate from list and deliverability factors. It tells you how persuasive the creative is once a subscriber opens.
                      • Why absolute volumes matter alongside rates. Email rate metrics (OR, CTR) measure efficiency per recipient; absolute volumes (total opens, total clicks, total recipients) measure total business impact. When a program scales reach, rate dilution is mathematically expected because the marginal recipient is by definition less engaged than the existing engaged base. Read the report this way: lead with CTOR (the rate that isolates creative) plus absolute opens/clicks (the volume that drives business) as the joint signal of program health; treat OR and CTR rate softening as the Q2 audience-activation focus, not a Q1 verdict.
                      • Same-brand cohort. The "Quality That Held" panel and diagnosis include a same-brand cohort metric: only the brands active in both Q1 2025 and Q1 2026. This isolates "did the existing audience get worse" from "did we add new lower-engagement brands," and is the most apples-to-apples internal comparison available.